Ex Parte CHALLAPALI et al - Page 11




          Appeal No. 1996-4091                                                        
          Application 08/167,394                                                      



          from the specification and Appellants' arguments that HD                    
          macroblock information comprises motion vectors.  See page 4                
          of Appellants' brief and page 3 of the specification.                       
                    Turning to Ng, we find that Ng discloses a system shown           
          in Figure 4 which converts directly HDTV compressed digital video           
          signals into a second digital television signal.  In particular,            
          in column 5, lines 38 through 59, Ng discloses that motion                  
          vectors are directly converted to the second macroblock                     
          information, SD macroblock information.  Thus, Ng teaches                   
          deriving SD macroblock information for said co-sited macroblock             
          directly from said HD macroblock information so as to form a                
          second digital television signal as claimed by Appellants.                  
          Therefore, we find that Ng does teach a method which enables                
          direct conversion of HD macroblock information into SD macroblock           
          information.                                                                
                    We answered all of Appellants' arguments.  Appellants             
          have chosen not to argue any of the other specific limitations of           
          claim 1 as a basis for patentability.  We are not required to               
          raise and/or consider such issues.  As stated by our reviewing              
          court in In re Baxter Travenol Labs., 952 F.2d 388, 391,                    
          21 USPQ2d 1281, 1285 (Fed. Cir. 1991), "[i]t is not the function            
          of this court to examine the claims in greater detail than argued           


                                          11                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007