THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte HOLGER HEIL, JOSEF-MATTHIAS GANTIOLER and RAINALD SANDER ____________ Appeal No. 1996-4200 Application No. 08/330,3411 ____________ HEARD: October 20, 1999 ____________ Before HAIRSTON, LALL, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 4. Appellants’ Amendment After Final (paper number 13) amending claims 1 and 4, and canceling claims 2 and 3 was 1Application for patent filed October 27, 1994.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007