Appeal No. 1996-4200 Application No. 08/330,341 said MOSFETs being of the same channel type" (claims 1 and 4), and "all of said MOSFETs having a bulk terminal connected to said second terminal for the supply voltage (claim 1). In summary, we are of the opinion that the examiner has fallen victim to the use of impermissible hindsight in demonstrating the obviousness of the claimed invention. The obviousness rejection of claims 1 and 4 is, therefore, reversed. DECISION The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 and 4 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007