THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not
written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT P. COLWELL, MICHAEL A. FETTERMAN, GLENN J.
HINTON, ROBERT W. MARTELL, and DAVID B. PAPWORTH
____________
Appeal No. 97-0266
Application No. 08/176,3701
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 and 3 through 43, which are all of the
claims pending in this application. In the Examiner's Answer,
the examiner objected to claims 18, 19, 32 through 34, and 41
through 43 as being dependent upon rejected base claims. With
the Reply Brief filed on October 2, 1995, claims 18, 19, 32
1Application for patent filed December 30, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007