THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TATEO AOYAMA and MASAHIRO UCHIDA
____________
Appeal No. 97-1017
Application No. 08/391,4211
____________
HEARD: August 5, 1999
____________
Before CALVERT, ABRAMS and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner
finally rejecting claims 1-7, 13-15 and 19-37. Claims 8-12,
16-18, 38-51, 56 and 57 have been allowed and claims 52-55
have been canceled.
1Application for patent filed February 16, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007