THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAVID C. McCLURE
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1060
Application No. 08/172,8481
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-37, which
represents all of the claims remaining in the application.
The invention pertains to a method and system for testing
a packaged semiconductor memory device to determine whether
1Application for patent filed December 22, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007