THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte WOLFGANG SCHULZ
________________
Appeal No. 97-1243
Application 08/443,3011
________________
HEARD: JUNE 10, 1999
________________
Before STAAB, McQUADE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claim 1. Claims 2-4 have been objected to as
being dependent upon a rejected claim, but would be allowable
1Application for patent filed May 17, 1995.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007