Appeal No. 97-1243
Application 08/443,301
that appellant has not challenged these positions with any
reasonable degree of specificity.
Accordingly, as argued, we will sustain the examiner’s
anticipation/obviousness rejection of claim 1 based on
Stocker.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
LAWRENCE J. STAAB )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
JOHN P. McQUADE ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-9-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007