THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DONALD L. PURINTON and LOUIS R. SEMFF
____________
Appeal No. 97-1417
Application No. 08/273,0401
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, HANLON, and ROBINSON, Administrative
Patent Judges.
HANLON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1-19 and 21, all of the claims pending in
the application. Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject
matter on appeal and reads as follows:
1. A radome comprising:
1Application for patent filed July 8, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007