Appeal No. 97-1417 Application No. 08/273,040 (a) an exterior wall, said wall including: (i) a central region of porous material comprising a ceramic material impregnated with an inorganic resin and having a pair of opposing exterior surfaces; and (ii) a skin overlying each of said opposing surfaces to form a composite structure, said skin comprising a first cloth of ceramic material impregnated with an inorganic resin which, under pyrolysis, provides an elemental carbon-free material and, with increased temperature, gradually converts from the liquid state to a resilient state and then to a solid state by about 1200°F. The references relied upon by the examiner are: Boyd et al. (Boyd) 5,134,421 Jul. 28, 1992 Liimatta et al. (Liimatta) 5,198,152 Mar. 30, 1993 The sole issue on appeal is whether the examiner properly rejected claims 1-19 and 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the combination of Boyd and Liimatta. Discussion Claim 1 is directed to a radome comprising an exterior wall including: (1) a central region of porous material comprising a ceramic material impregnated with an inorganic resin and having a pair of opposing exterior surfaces; and 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007