Ex parte PURINTON et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 97-1417                                                          
          Application No. 08/273,040                                                  


               (2) a skin overlying each of the opposing surfaces                     
          whereby the skin comprises a ceramic material impregnated with              
          an inorganic resin which, under pyrolysis, provides an                      
          elemental carbon-free material and, with increased                          
          temperature, gradually converts from the liquid state to a                  
          resilient state and then to a solid state by about 1200EF.                  
          The inorganic resin is preferably a polysilazane or a                       
          polysiloxane (Specification, p.3).                                          




               According to the examiner (Answer, p.3):                               
               Boyd et al discloses a radome comprising a honeycomb                   
               or foam layer laminated with face sheets of resin                      
               impregnated-fiber reinforced material and the use of                   
               ceramic materials for these layers; see column 2,                      
               lines 18-40 and the paragraph bridging columns 5 and                   
               6.  However, Boyd et al do not disclose the                            
               particular claimed materials used to form the fiber                    
               reinforced layers . . . .  Liimatta et al discloses                    
               the use of polysilizane [sic, polysilazane]                            
               materials as an infiltrant in ceramic fiber                            
               reinforced composites which may be used in radomes;                    
               see column 1, lines 13-18 and 49-50, column 2, lines                   
               65-67 and column 4, lines 42-49.                                       
          The examiner continues (Answer, p.4):                                       
               Ii [sic, It] is the examiner's position that since                     
               Liimatta et al disclose the same impregnate as that                    
               disclosed by appellant, namely polysilizane [sic,                      
               polysilazane], that the claimed property under                         
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007