Appeal No. 97-2020
Application 07/957,107
signals to drive matrix displays and (2) the admitted prior
art with its teaching of driving active matrix displays with
amplitude modulated signals, would have been led in a
direction away from the path taken by appellants. In re
Gurley, 27 F.3d 551, 553, 31 USPQ2d 1130, 1131 (Fed. Cir.
1994).
Whereas the examiner established a prima facie case
of obviousness which has not been rebutted by argument or
evidence, the rejection should be sustained.
STANLEY M. URYNOWICZ, JR. ) BOARD OF
PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS
AND
) INTERFERENCES
SMU:psb
18
Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007