THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for publication
in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte R. LARRY COMSTOCK, NAUM V. GITIS,
and ROBERT L. SMITH
__________________
Appeal No. 97-2035
Application 08/161,2341
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before BARRETT, JERRY SMITH and LEE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-15. No claim has been
allowed.
References relied on by the Examiner
Coughlin et al. 4,700,248 Oct. 13,
1987
(Coughlin)
Kubo et al. (Kubo) 5,198,934 Mar. 30,
1993
1
Application for patent filed December 2, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007