Ex parte SHAH et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 97-2470                                         Page 3           
          Application No. 08/201,817                                                  


               Claim 1, which is representative for our purposes,                     
          follows:                                                                    
               Claim 1.  A bridge circuit adapted to be associated                    
               with first and      second bus circuits to transfer                    
               data therebetween comprising:                                          
               data buffers for storing data being transferred                        
               between the buses,                                                     
               a circuit for causing a bus master on the first bus                    
               which has attempted an access of the second bus                        
               through the bridge circuit to retry its access,                        
               circuitry for masking any retry until the second bus                   
               is again available, and                                                
               circuitry for providing an interval during which a                     
               bus master on the secondary bus may not gain access                    
               to the second bus after the second bus is                              
               relinquished so that a sequence of retry operations                    
               causing a thrashing condition on the first bus is                      
               not generated.                                                         


               The reference relied on by the patent examiner in                      
          rejecting the claims follows:                                               
          Heil et al. (Heil)                 5,418,914           May                  
          23, 1995                                                                    
                              (effective filing date Sept. 17, 1991)                  

               Claims 1 through 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                     
          § 102(e)  as anticipated by Heil.  (Examiner’s Answer, ¶ 9.)                
          Rather than repeat the arguments of the appellants or examiner              








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007