THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 13 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte STEPHEN J. AMURO and PAUL J. GIORGIO ____________ Appeal No. 97-2979 Application No. 08/219,5531 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1-7. The appellants filed an amendment after final rejection on April 25, 1996, which was entered. We reverse. 1The application, entitled “Non-intrusive SCSI Status Sensing System,” was filed March 29, 1994.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007