THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte STEPHEN J. AMURO and PAUL J. GIORGIO
____________
Appeal No. 97-2979
Application No. 08/219,5531
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and BARRY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the final rejection of claims 1-7. The appellants filed
an amendment after final rejection on April 25, 1996, which
was entered. We reverse.
1The application, entitled “Non-intrusive SCSI Status
Sensing System,” was filed March 29, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007