Appeal No. 97-2979 Page 4 Application No. 08/219,553 advanced by the examiner. We also considered the appellants’ and examiner’s arguments. After considering the record before us, it is our view that the evidence and level of skill in the art would not have suggested to one of ordinary skill in the art the invention of claims 1-3. Accordingly, we reverse. We begin our consideration of the obviousness of the claims by recalling that in rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103, the patent examiner bears the initial burden of establishing a prima facie case of obviousness. A prima facie case is established when the teachings from the prior art itself would appear to have suggested the claimed subject matter to a person of ordinary skill in the art. If the examiner fails to establish a prima facie case, an obviousness rejection is improper and will be overturned. In re Rijckaert, 9 F.3d 1531, 1532, 28 USPQ2d 1955, 1956 (Fed. Cir. 1993). With this in mind, we analyze the examiner’s rejection. The examiner begins the rejection by observing that Fischer describes a system comprising host processors, aPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007