Ex parte AMURO et al. - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 97-2979                                                                                       Page 3                        
                 Application No. 08/219,553                                                                                                             







                          The references relied on by the patent examiner in                                                                            
                 rejecting the claims follow:                                                                                                           
                 Fischer               4,783,730               Nov. 8, 1988                                                                             

                 American National Standards Institute (ANSI), ANSI X3.131-                                                                             
                 1986, “Small Computer System Interface(SCSI)”, June 23, 1986,                                                                          
                 pp. 26, 51-71, 80-82, 185-186, 194-199, 208-209.                                                                                       
                          Claims 1-3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                                                                            
                 obvious over Fischer in view of ANSI.  (Examiner’s Answer at                                                                           
                 3.)   Rather than repeat the arguments of the appellants or2                                                                                                                                
                 examiner in toto, we refer the reader to the appeal and reply                                                                          
                 briefs and the examiner’s answers for the respective details                                                                           
                 thereof.                                                                                                                               


                                                                     OPINION                                                                            
                          In reaching our decision in this appeal, we considered                                                                        
                 the  subject matter on appeal and the rejection and evidence                                                                           


                          2Claims 4-7 stand objected to as being dependent on a                                                                         
                 rejected base claim.  (Examiner’s Answer at 5.)                                                                                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007