Ex parte AMURO et al. - Page 8




          Appeal No. 97-2979                                         Page 8           
          Application No. 08/219,553                                                  


               SCSI standard to obtain such a result as disclosed                     
               by Appellants.  (Reply Br. at 4-5.)                                    

               We agree with the appellants’ explanation.  The examiner               
          fails to identify a controller in the references that                       
          initiates  status requests.  For the foregoing reasons, the                 
          examiner failed to show that Fischer and ANSI teach or would                
          have suggested a controller as in independent claim 1 and its               
          dependent claims.  Therefore, we find the examiner’s rejection              
          does not amount to a prima facie case of obviousness.  Because              
          the examiner has not established a prima facie case, the                    
          rejection of claims 1-3 over Fischer in view of ANSI is                     
          improper.  Therefore, we reverse the rejection of the claims                
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                                      





















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007