Appeal No. 98-0393 Application No. 08/450,271 We also agree with the examiner that it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to roll the refractory body into position, as required by claims 12 and 18. In our view, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to roll Koffron's specifically disclosed octagonal pyramid body, with the understanding that it would have been obvious to round off the eight edges of the body to prevent damage thereto. Since rolling was admittedly known in the art as a way of introducing spherically shaped vortex inhibitors, it would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the octagonal pyramid body of Koffron in the manner of appellant to facilitate rolling the body into position. In conclusion, based on the foregoing, the examiner's decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) -10-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007