THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN C. NEWKIRK, LARRY D. ROSE,
DONALD R. LAURITZEN, MICHAEL J. RAVENBERG, MARK A. THOMPSON,
DAVID J. GREEN and TERRY R. DAVIS
____________
Appeal No. 98-0680
Application No. 08/685,1601
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MEISTER, PATE and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed July 23, 1996. According
to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/280,894 filed July 27, 1994, now abandoned;
which is a continuation-in-part of Application No. 07/993,277
filed December 18, 1992, now U.S. Patent No. 5,470,105 issued
November 28, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007