Appeal No. 98-0680 Application No. 08/685,160 preventing the air bag from initially inflating asymmetrically (see column 4, lines 21 and 22). In the reply brief (page 2) the appellants argue that Rion attributes the non-asymmetric inflation of the air bag to the manifold and not the holes. This argument overlooks the fact that the evenly spaced holes are a part of the manifold and form the final distribution path of the inflation gas as it is deployed. See column 4, lines 23-36, wherein it is stated that the inflation gas is channeled into chambers 22a,22b and then out openings 44a-44d in order "to provide for a more uniform inflation of the air bag." The appellants also contend that the member 92 of Good cannot be considered to be a diffuser in accordance with the examiner's findings since Good styles this member as a "retainer." However, regardless of the terminology employed by Good to describe the member 92, it is self-evident that Good's inflation gas flows through the openings in this member and is "diffused" thereby. Indeed, we are at a loss to understand how the appellants can seriously make such a 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007