Ex parte BROGER et al. - Page 25




          Appeal No. 1998-1562                                      Page 25           
          Application No. 08/611,416                                                  


                                     CONCLUSION                                       
               To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject                   
          claim 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, is reversed;              
          the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1, 16 to 18 and               
          21 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by                         
          Eichenberger is reversed; the decision of the examiner to                   
          reject claims 1, 2, 21 and 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                   
          being anticipated by Johannsson is affirmed with respect to                 
          claims 1, 2 and 22 but is reversed with respect to claim 21;                
          the decision of the examiner to reject claims 2 to 4 and 8                  
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed; the decision of the                      
          examiner to reject claims 5, 6, 19 and 20 under 35 U.S.C. §                 
          103 is reversed; and new rejections of claims 1, 16 to 20 and               
          22 have been added pursuant to provisions of                                
          37 CFR § 1.196(b).                                                          


               In addition to affirming the examiner's rejection of one               
          or more claims, this decision contains a new ground of                      
          rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec.              


          claim 19.                                                                   







Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007