Ex parte NAKAIZUMI - Page 2




          Appeal No. 98-1643                                                          
          Application No. 08/544,582                                                  

          and second paragraphs.  Since, as to the remaining rejection,               
          claims 3 through 17 are now indicated as being directed to                  
          allowable subject matter, the appeal before us involves only                
          claims 1 and 2.                                                             
               The invention is directed to a tester for integrated                   
          circuits wherein testing functions are performed by both a                  
          semiconductor chip and a testing set for inputting signals to               
          an integrated circuit under test.  The semiconductor chip is                
          in direct contact with the integrated circuit under test.                   
               Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as                    
          follows:                                                                    
               1. A tester for integrated circuits, comprising:                       
                    (a) a testing set for supplying inputs to an                      
          integrated circuit under test for operation thereof and for                 
          measuring outputs of said integrated circuit under test; and                
                    (b) a semiconductor chip or wafer arranged to be in               
          direct contact with said integrated circuit under test, said                
          semiconductor chip or wafer having at least one testing                     
          function for testing said integrated circuit under test.                    
               The examiner relies on the following reference:                        
               Leedy                    5,020,219                Jun. 4,              
          1991                                                                        
               Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as              
          anticipated by Leedy.                                                       
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007