Appeal No. 98-2124 Page 15 Application No. 08/454,898 3, lines 14-21). Accordingly, one of ordinary skill in this art would have been motivated to make solder tails 88 of Biechler resilient in order to apply a spring force as taught by Baechtle, and thus achieve Baechtle's expressly stated advantage of providing proper contact between the solder tails and the mother board prior to soldering, thereby avoiding the disadvantage of a deficient solder joint. In this regard, it should be noted that there is no claim limitation which would preclude the solder tails from being subsequently soldered. The appellants also contend that Baechtle teaches away from providing solder tails that are designed to impart a "normal" force to the mother board since Baechtle desires to apply a low force. This argument is not commensurate with the scope of the claimed subject matter inasmuch as no particular amount of force as been set forth. Moreover, the prior art disclosed by Baechtle in column 2 teaches providing a "normal" force (see line 57). The appellants also contend that the references do not address their problem of durability, insertion force, cross- talk and signal reflections. We must point out, however, that “[a]s long as some motivation or suggestion to combine thePage: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007