Ex parte COHEN et al. - Page 20




          Appeal No. 98-2124                                        Page 20           
          Application No. 08/454,898                                                  


               The rejection of claims 1, 2, 12, 13, 15, 21 and 22 under              
          35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Biechler is                      
          affirmed.                                                                   
               The rejection of claims 4, 5 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. §                  
          102(b) as being anticipated by Biechler is reversed.                        
               The rejection of claims 1, 2, 12, 13, 15, 21 and 22 under              
          35 U.S.C. § 103 based on the combined teachings of Biechler,                
          Piorunneck and Baechtle is affirmed.                                        
               The rejection of claims 4, 5 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103              
          based on the combined teachings of Biechler, Piorunneck and                 
          Baechtle is reversed.                                                       
               The rejection of claims 1, 2, 12 and 13 under 35 U.S.C. §              
          103 based on the combined teachings of Yohn, Piorunneck and                 
          Baechtle is affirmed.                                                       
               The rejection of claims 4, 5, 10, 15, 21 and 22 under 35               
          U.S.C. § 103 based on the combined teachings of Yohn,                       
          Piorunneck and Baechtle is reversed.                                        














Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007