THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte NICHOLAS A. AHR and GARY D. LAVON
____________
Appeal No. 1998-2791
Application No. 08/422,6761
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge and FRANKFORT
and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 28, 29, 31 through 34 and 36. Claim 35,
the only other claim pending in this application, stands
Application for patent filed April 13, 1995. According to the1
appellants, the application is a continuation of Application No. 08/081,733,
filed June 23, 1993, now abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007