Ex parte AHR et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-2791                                       Page 3           
          Application No. 08/422,676                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellants' invention relates to a disposable                      
          absorbent article comprising an inflatable component and first              
          and second materials disposed on the article separated by a                 
          breakable barrier, wherein the first and second materials are               
          combinable (by breaking of the barrier) to inflate the                      
          inflatable chamber.  An understanding of the invention can be               
          derived from a reading of exemplary claim 28, which appears in              
          the appendix to the appellants' brief.                                      
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
               Whyte               3,921,232                     Nov. 25,             
          1975                                                                        
               Kato                     4,781,645                     Nov.            
          1, 1988                                                                     
               Lieberman                4,929,214                     May             
          29, 1990                                                                    
               The following rejection is before us for review.                       
               Claims 28, 29, 31-34 and 36 stand rejected under 35                    
          U.S.C.  § 103 as being unpatentable over Whyte in view of                   
          Lieberman and Kato.                                                         
               Reference is made to the brief (Paper No. 22) and reply                
          brief (Paper No. 25) and the non-final Office action mailed                 








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007