Appeal No. 1998-2941 Page 7
Application No. 08/061,985
Reexamination Control No. 90/003,682
view of Padley, and claims 7, 11, 13, 16, 17, 18/16, and 19/16
stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over the references as applied in paragraph (2) above in view
of Padley.
(4) Claims 20, 25-28, 33-35, 46/20, and 46/28 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by
Dunn.
(5) Claims 20, 22, 23, 25-28, 30, 31, 33-35, 46/20, and
46/28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being
anticipated by either one of the News & Observer article or
the PSA abstract.
(6) Claims 20, 22-27, and 46/20 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Donchev.
(7) Claims 22-24 and 30-32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Dunn.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007