THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte UWE BOCK and JOACHIM GLUCK
____________
Appeal No. 1999-0422
Application No. 08/628,8051
____________
HEARD: November 17, 1999
____________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, FRANKFORT and
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal
to allow claims 9, 10, 15, 16 and 18 as amended after the
final rejection in Paper Nos. 11 and 14. Claims 19 and 20,
the only other claims remaining in the application, have been
Application for patent filed April 5, 1996.1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007