Appeal No. 1999-0422 Page 2 Application No. 08/628,805 indicated as allowable by the examiner (advisory action, Paper No. 12) and are not involved in this appeal.2 BACKGROUND The appellants' invention relates to a heat exchanger for cooling semi-conductor components comprising a base section and cooling fins attached to and projecting from the base section. Each fin has a wavy profile in the region where it joins the base section. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 9, which appears in the appendix to the appellants' brief. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Hess 5,014,776 May 14, 1991 Serizawa et al. (Serizawa) 5,542,176 Aug. 6, 1996 (filed Jan. 30, 1995) The following rejection is before us for review. In the amendment filed August 25, 1997 (Paper No. 11), after the final2 rejection, claims 11-14 and allowable claim 17 were canceled and claim 20 was substituted for canceled claim 17. Additionally, claim 19 was amended to depend from new claim 20.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007