Ex parte ENGELSON et al. - Page 17




          Appeal No. 1999-0610                                      Page 17           
          Application No. 08/601,186                                                  


          monomers of polysaccharides) would have been recognized by one              
          of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the appellants'                 
          invention as being biocompatible and lubricious and,                        
          accordingly, to determine whether the subject matter of any of              
          claims 49 through 60 would have been obvious over Castillo et               
          al. in view of references such as Sahatjian, Whitbourne and                 
          the Lentz patents, which disclose the use of lubricious                     
          coatings on catheters, either alone or in further view of such              
          evidence.                                                                   
               From our viewpoint, the coating materials disclosed by                 
          appellants are known materials; the examiner should determine               
          if any of them may further have been recognized by one of                   
          ordinary skill in the art at the time appellants' invention                 
          was made as being lubricious.  In view of the teachings of                  
          references such as Sahatjian, Whitbourne and the Lentz patents              
          to provide lubricious coatings on catheters, the examiner                   
          should assess whether it would have been obvious to have                    
          coated the Castillo catheter with other known coating                       
          materials recognized in the prior art at the time of the                    










Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007