Appeal No. 1999-0610 Page 17 Application No. 08/601,186 monomers of polysaccharides) would have been recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the appellants' invention as being biocompatible and lubricious and, accordingly, to determine whether the subject matter of any of claims 49 through 60 would have been obvious over Castillo et al. in view of references such as Sahatjian, Whitbourne and the Lentz patents, which disclose the use of lubricious coatings on catheters, either alone or in further view of such evidence. From our viewpoint, the coating materials disclosed by appellants are known materials; the examiner should determine if any of them may further have been recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art at the time appellants' invention was made as being lubricious. In view of the teachings of references such as Sahatjian, Whitbourne and the Lentz patents to provide lubricious coatings on catheters, the examiner should assess whether it would have been obvious to have coated the Castillo catheter with other known coating materials recognized in the prior art at the time of thePage: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007