Appeal No. 1999-0610 Page 12 Application No. 08/601,186 of friction approximating that of silicone, for example, or lower.8 In rejecting claims 49 through 60 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, the examiner relies upon the combined teachings of Castillo and Eury. The examiner and appellants agree that Castillo discloses a catheter comprising a relatively flexible distal segment (tip 14), a relatively stiff proximal segment (catheter body 15), carrying a reinforcing braid (column 3, lines 20-22) and a transition zone (13) which is free of the reinforcing braid, and thus more flexible than the proximal segment, but less flexible than the distal segment (column 3, lines 49-53). The examiner concedes, however, that Castillo does not disclose a coating on the distal segment of the catheter. Eury discloses an antithrombogenic surface coating for use on biomedical devices, such as catheters, which come into contact with a patient's blood flow, to present a blood contacting surface which is as hemocompatible as possible so 8This accords with the use of the term "lubricious" in the biomedical field as exemplified by Sahatjian (column 1, lines 49 to 52, and column 2, lines 32 to 35) and Whitbourne (column 1, lines 15 to 19).Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007