Ex parte MICHAELI - Page 1




                                            THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                               
                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                                                                                        
                     (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                                                                                          
                     (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                                 Paper No. 14                                          

                                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                               
                                                                                __________                                                                                             
                                                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                               
                                                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                             
                                                                                __________                                                                                             
                                                                 Ex parte JOSEPH MICHAELI                                                                                              
                                                                                __________                                                                                             
                                                                        Appeal No. 99-0837                                                                                             
                                                                   Application 29/074,2681                                                                                             
                                                                                __________                                                                                             
                                                                   HEARD: April 21, 1999                                                                                               
                                                                                __________                                                                                             

                     Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, McCANDLISH,                                                                                                     
                     Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and McQUADE,                                                                                                                  
                     Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                                      
                     McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                   
                                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                             
                                This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final                                                                                              
                     rejection of the following design claim:                                                                                                                          
                                           The ornamental design for a Drinking Glass                                                                                                  

                                1Application for patent filed July 14, 1997.                                                                                                           
                                                                                          1                                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007