Appeal No. 99-0837 Application No. 29/074,268 as shown and described. The Claimed Design According to appellant’s specification, the drinking glass as illustrated in Figures 1-6 of the drawings is “shaped like a coconut . . .” In his brief (see page 2), appellant describes the illustrated drinking glass as having “a generally prolate ellipsoid shape with a flat bottom.” The drinking glass is shown to have a circumferential parting line dividing the drinking glass into what appellant describes on page 2 of the brief as upper and lower hemispheres. The lower hemisphere is truncated to provide the flat bottom. The upper hemisphere is shown to have three indentations or depressions which are symmetrically arranged about the upper extremity of the hemisphere. The Appealed Rejection The appealed claim stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 171 “as being directed to non-statutory subject matter as it simulates a naturally occurring object and, therefore, lacks originality” (answer, page 4). There are no other rejections of the appealed claim, and no prior art has been cited in support of the standing rejection. Accordingly, the only issue 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007