THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SHUICHI SHIMIZU et al. ____________ Appeal No. 1999-1530 Application No. 08/728,6071 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before ABRAMS, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 to 3, 8 to 19 and 21. Claims 4 to 7 2 and 20 have been allowed. No claim has been canceled. We AFFIRM. 1Application for patent filed October 10, 1996. 2Claim 1 was amended subsequent to the final rejection.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007