THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ARNOLD H. ZLOTNIK, JOHN A. AUSTIN and MILTON ZLOTNIK
____________
Appeal No. 1999-1816
Application No. 08/370,5401
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before STAAB, NASE, and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 to 8, 10, 16, 24 and 30 to 43. Claim 44
has been allowed. Claims 11 to 15, 17, 18 and 25 have been
withdrawn from consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as being
drawn to a nonelected invention. Claims 9, 19 to 23, 26, 27
and 29 have been canceled. Since no rejection of dependent
1Application for patent filed January 9, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007