Appeal No. 1999-1816 Page 2
Application No. 08/370,540
claim 28 has been set forth in the answer (Paper No. 19,
mailed November 9, 1998), we assume that claim 28 is objected
to as depending from a non-allowed claim.
We AFFIRM-IN-PART.
BACKGROUND
The appellants' invention relates to a frame assembly for
a deodorant cabinet. An understanding of the invention can be
derived from a reading of exemplary claims 1, 2 and 42, which
appears in the appendix to the appellants' brief.
The prior art references of record relied upon by the
examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:
Zlotnik et al. 4,931,258 June
5, 1990
(Zlotnik)
Tisbo et al. 5,372,415 Dec. 13,
1994
(Tisbo)
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007