Interference No. 102,622 benefit date of March 4, 1988, to May 13, 1988, Oates' filing date for her involved application, a period of 71 days. For reasons which follow, we find Oates has failed to meet her burden of persuasion. Oates represents that the following chain of events constitutes reasonable diligence: on March 2, 1988, Mr. Morris conducted a computer search for patents relevant to the subject matter of Oates' MOI (OX-14); Oates sent Morris additional information in response to a request by him for more details on the preparation of the allylic carbonate on March 10, 1988 (OX-5); Mr. Morris' secretary had a note, handwritten by her on March 25, 1988, indicating that Ms. Oates phoned with information for Mr. Morris while Mr. Morris was out of the office (OX-16); Mr. Morris had handwritten notes of a conversation he had with Oates bearing a date of April 4, 1988 (OX-15); on April 28, 1988, Morris sent Oates a first draft of the application for her review (OX-6); on May 4, 1988, Morris sent the final draft to Oates along with a letter of transmittal (OX-7); Oates signed the declaration/power of attorney; assignment and duty of disclosure document sent to her by Morris on May 9, 1988 (OX- 9, OX-10); the duty of disclosure document was received by the 13Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007