Interference No. 102,622 particular aspect of Oates' case (OR p.238, lines 6 through 23). Moreover, Mr. Morris could not identify any of the five additional applications he testified he filed between December 15, 1987, and May 12, 1988 (OR p. 239-40). Nor could he recall what ratings the applications were assigned (OR p. 241). Mr. Morris could not remember what action he took between March 10, 1988, and April 28, 1988, with respect to the Oates' application (OR p. 244, line 23) and Mr. Morris admitted that nothing in the exhibits on which Oates relies describes any specific activity (OR p. 246, lines 13 through 24). Oates has simply failed to present adequate evidence on this record on which we could find the exercise of reasonable diligence by Mr. Morris, her attorney, during the critical time period. While it is certainly possible that Mr. Morris and Oates' agents were actively engaged on every day during the critical period in working towards filing the Oates' application or working on other cases in his docket, we simply have not been presented with any evidence establishing exactly what work was performed by Mr. Morris or when any specific work was performed by Mr. Morris. Oates has simply failed to satisfy her burden of persuasion on this issue. 17Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007