THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte ZINE-EDDINE BOUTAGHOU
__________________
Appeal No. 2000-0617
Application 08/706,0251
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before LEE, GARDNER-LANE and MEDLEY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s final rejection of claims 13, 15-23 and 25.
A. Findings of Fact
1. The applicant states that the real party in interest
is International Business Machines Corporation. (Brief at 1).
2. The application on appeal contains claims 13, 15-23
and 25.
1
Application for patent filed August 30, 1996, which
is a division of application 08/446,381, filed May 22, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007