Ex parte BOUTAGHOU - Page 2




                     Appeal No. 2000-0617                                                                                                                                              
                     Application 08/706,025                                                                                                                                            
                                3.         Claims 1-12, 14 and 24 have been canceled.                                                                                                  
                                4.         Claims 13, 15-23 and 25 have been rejected as being                                                                                         
                     unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Nagata et al.                                                                                                             
                     (Nagata), U.S. Patent 5,486,054, issued January 23, 1996,                                                                                                         
                     based on application 08/304,545, filed September 12, 1994 in                                                                                                      
                     view of Nakagawa, Kokai patent application Hei 5[1993]-176520,                                                                                                    
                     published July 13, 1993.                                                                                                                                          
                                5.         Claims 13, 15 and 16  have been rejected as being2                                                                                                
                     unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Inoue et al. (Inoue),                                                                                                     
                     U.S. Patent 4,856,918, issued August 15, 1989 in view of                                                                                                          
                     Moriwaki et al. (Moriwaki), Kokai patent application Sho                                                                                                          
                     62[1987]-255611, published November 7, 1987, and Nakagawa.                                                                                                        
                                6.         Claims 19, 20, 23 and 25  have been rejected as being3                                                                                        
                     unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over Inoue in view of                                                                                                          
                     Moriwaki and Brown, U.S. Patent 2,063,787, issued December 8,                                                                                                     
                     1936.                                                                                                                                                             


                                2  The examiner indicates that claim 14 is rejected.                                                                                                   
                     (Answer at 5).  This appears to be a typographical error,                                                                                                         
                     since claim 14 has been canceled.  See Paper No. 10, entered                                                                                                      
                     October 20, 1997.                                                                                                                                                 
                                3The examiner indicates that claim 24 is rejected.                                                                                                     
                     (Answer at 5).  This appears to be a typographical error,                                                                                                         
                     since claim 24 has been canceled.  See Paper No. 10, entered                                                                                                      
                     October 20, 1997.                                                                                                                                                 
                                                                                          2                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007