Ex parte MCKIERNAN et al. - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     
                                                               Paper No. 14           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      

                     Ex parte EDWARD McKIERNAN, JAMES A. SIGLER                       
                               and WILLIAM J. FRIEDMAN                                
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2000-1230                                  
                             Application No. 08/717,904                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      

          Before CALVERT, ABRAMS, and NASE, Administrative Patent                     
          Judges.                                                                     
          CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to              
          3, 12 to 15 and 21.  Of the other claims remaining in the                   
          application, claim 11 stands withdrawn from consideration as                
          being directed to a nonelected species, and claims 4 to 10 and              
          16 to 20 are indicated as being allowable if rewritten in                   
          independent form.                                                           







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007