Ex parte MCKIERNAN et al. - Page 6




                 Appeal No. 2000-1230                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/717,904                                                                                                             


                 but upon what the prior art would have suggested to one of                                                                             
                 ordinary skill in the art.                                                                                                             
                          Appellants argue that there is no prima facie case of                                                                         
                 obviousness  because even though the Kinsey valve has been2                                                                                                                  
                 available in the art for eight decades prior to appellants’                                                                            
                 invention, "no one heretofore provided the invention despite                                                                           
                 the                                                                                                                                    



















                          2A prima facie case of obviousness exists when the prior                                                                      
                 art teachings would appear to be sufficient to one of ordinary                                                                         
                 skill in the art to suggest making the claimed substitution or                                                                         
                 other modification.  In re Lalu, 747 F.2d 703, 705, 223 USPQ                                                                           
                 1257, 1258 (Fed. Cir. 1984).                                                                                                           
                                                                           6                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007