Interference No. 103,203
USPQ2d at 1616, quoting Engel Indus. v. Lockformer Co., 946 F.2d 1528, 1531, 20
USPQ2d 1300, 1302 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (“Unclaimed subject matter is not subject to the
disclosure requirement of § 112; the reasons are pragmatic: the disclosure would be
boundless and the pitfalls endless”).
(10) Edgington et al.’s Motion to Suppress is DENIED. We have carefully
considered Edgington et al.’s arguments set forth in support of the motion, but find that they
are more germane to the evidentiary weight the exhibits should be accorded, rather than
their admissibility.
Redeclaration of the Interference
The interference is herein redeclared by substituting Count 1 with Count 2.
Count 2 is as follows:
An isolated DNA segment comprising a nucleotide sequence coding
for a human tissue factor heavy chain protein having an amino acid residue
sequence represented by FIG. 1 from about residue 1 to about residue 263.
19
Page: Previous 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007