THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte EDWIN R. SMITH, JEFFREY M. SCHUETZ
and STANLEY LUSTIG
_____________
Appeal No. 1996-0328
Application 08/060,891
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before SCHAFER, LEE and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
Applicants appeal from the rejection of claims 1 and 7-22 and 26-36, all the claims in the
1
application. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134.
The examiner cited the following references in the rejection of the claims:
1
In addition to the brief, applicants filed an amendment which canceled claims 2, 3, 23 and 24. This
amendment has been entered by the examiner.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007