Appeal No. 1996-1042 Application No. 07/810,138 we find it unnecessary to discuss the Grandi Declaration, filed under the provisions of 37 CFR § 1.132 and executed February 15, 1994, relied on by appellants as rebutting any such prima facie case. The rejection of claims 9 through 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, is reversed. Respecting the rejections of claims 9 through 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103, appellants argue that Young, Dean '235, Dean '236, and Dean '773 disclose asporogenous strains of Bacillus subtilis having a reversion frequency "as low as 10 "-7 but no lower. See the Appeal Brief, pages 7 and 12. The examiner acknowledges that this is the case, i.e., that the "primary" references teach asporogenous strains of Bacillus subtilis having reversion frequencies "as low as 10 " but no-7 lower. Nevertheless, the examiner states that "it remains unclear that the strain claimed by appellants has a lower reversion rate than those disclosed in any of the cited references" (Examiner's Answer, page 11, last paragraph). In resolving questions of obviousness, one must consider the claimed subject matter as a whole. 35 U.S.C. § 103. Here, each independent claim expressly recites the -6-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007