THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte RICHARD L. SIEVERS
________________
Appeal No. 1996-1577
Application No. 08/215,2051
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed March 21, 1994. According
to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application No. 07/988,730, filed December 10, 1992, now
abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part of Application No.
07/809,388, filed December 17, 1991, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007