Appeal No. 1996-1699
Application No. 08/077,681
objective truth of the statements made in appellants’
specification, we are of the opinion that structural
differences do exist between the product made by appealed
claim 1 and the method of the APA.
In view of the above, the examiner’s rejection of claim 5
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 will not be sustained.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject
claims 1 through 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
HARRISON E. McCANDLISH )
Senior Administrative Patent Judge )
)
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007