Ex parte ZEIGLER et al. - Page 3


                            Appeal No. 1996-2718                                                                                                                                                                                              
                            Application No. 08/221,207                                                                                                                                                                                        



                            the invention.                                                                                                                                                                                                    
                            C.            Under 35 U.S.C. ' 103, claims 1-4, 6-8, and 10 stand rejected as obvious to one of ordinary                                                                                                         
                            skill in the art at the time the invention was made.                                                                                                                                                              
                                          1.            Claims 1-4, 7, 8, and 10 are rejected as unpatentable over Walz in view of Bock.2                                                                                                     
                                          2.            Claim 6 is rejected over Walz in view of Bock, as applied to claims 1-4, 7, 8, and 10                                                                                                 
                            above, and further in view of Wagner.                                                                                                                                                                             
                                                                                                         Claims at issue                                                                                                                      
                            D.            Claims 1-4, 6-8, and 10 are pending, with claims 1, 4, and 6 at issue.                                                                                                                              
                                          1.            Claim 1 is directed to a method of producing flexible fibers of superconducting                                                                                                       
                            material3, comprising the steps:                                                                                                                                                                                  
                                                        a.            melting a superconducting material in a furnace containing a heating space;                                                                                             
                                                        b.            heating the melted superconducting material to a temperature above its melting                                                                                          
                            point to form a stream of melted superconducting material;                                                                                                                                                        
                                                        c.            dropping the stream into a vertically extending barrel of a nozzle;                                                                                                     
                                                        d.            blowing a heated fiberizing gas downwardly through the barrel of the nozzle,                                                                                            
                            wherein                                                                                                                                                                                                           
                                                                      i.            the fiberizing gas has been heated to 150-750EF;                                                                                                          
                                                                      ii.           the fiberizing gas is blown at a rate sufficient to transform the                                                                                         



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
                            2 Claim 7 depends from claim 6, yet claim 6 is not included in this rejection.                                                                                                                                    
                            3 The present specification is directed to high temperature superconductors based on copper oxides.  See                                                                                                          
                            the present specification, p. 2, para. 3, through p. 9, para. 3.                                                                                                                                                  

                                                                                                                                                                                                              3                               




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007