Ex parte KOIZUMI et al. - Page 2



          Appeal No. 1996-3003                                                        
          Application 08/175,182                                                      


                    This is a decision on appeal from the final                       
          rejection of claims 3  through 11, all claims pending in this2                                                      
          application.                                                                
                    The invention relates to a hand held image scanner.               
          In particular, looking at Figure 1, light source 4 projects                 
          light through a transparent cover 3 onto script G.  Reflected               
          light from script G passes back into the image scanner through              
          a different portion of transparent cover 3 and is reflected by              
          mirrors 5 and 6 through objective lens 7 onto charge coupled                
          device 8.  Mounting board 40 is positioned above the optical                
          path between mirror 6 and detector 8, and supports one or more              
          electrical devices 42 which protrude through a top of casing                
          1.      Representative independent claim 3 is reproduced as                 
          follows:                                                                    
                    3.  A hand held image scanner, comprising:                        
                    a light source;                                                   
                    a window through which a light emitted from said                  
          light sources passes to illuminate a script;                                
                    an optical system for receiving light reflected from              
          said script through said window, said optical system                        
          comprising a first reflection surface for receiving and                     
          reflecting light reflected from said script, a second                       


               2It is noted that the amendment after final rejection,  received Sept. 22, 1995 as Paper No. 19½, has not been
          acted upon.  This amendment would improve the wording of claim 3, but not change the substance of the claim.
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007